August 4th, 2024

By Hector Navedo, Ed.D.

8-minute read

This article explores six key curricular approaches: Behaviorist, System, Academic, Humanistic, Directive, and Reconceptualist. Each offers unique methods for curriculum development. The analysis covers core principles, significance, and practical applications. It provides a comprehensive framework for educational leaders to foster intellectual, ethical, and personal growth in students.

Behaviorist

The Behaviorist approach, influenced by B.F. Skinner, emphasizes observable and measurable outcomes. It focuses on conditioning and reinforcement to shape behavior. This method is useful in environments requiring clear standards and accountability. However, it may neglect critical thinking and creativity (Skinner, 1954; Gagné, 1985; Kohn, 1999).

System

The System approach views education as an interconnected system. It emphasizes coherence and alignment within the institution. While complex to implement, it promotes efficiency and continuous improvement. This makes it valuable for educational leaders (Banathy, 1991; Senge, 2000; Fullan, 2007).

Academic

The Academic approach, also known as the subject-centered approach, prepares students for higher education and professional careers. It focuses on mastering academic disciplines like math, science, literature, and history. However, it may overlook the diverse interests and needs of all students (Glatthorn et al., 2016; Ornstein & Hunkins, 2018).

Humanistic

The Humanistic approach focuses on the whole person. It emphasizes emotional, social, and psychological growth. This learner-centered curriculum fosters self-actualization and personal fulfillment. It promotes empathy and interpersonal skills. Critics argue it may lack academic rigor (Rogers, 1969; Maslow, 1970; Noddings, 2005; Ravitch, 2010).

Directive or Managerial

The Directive approach emphasizes top-down decision-making. Leaders set clear goals and monitor implementation. This ensures consistency and coherence but can be hierarchical. It may stifle teacher autonomy and creativity (Sergiovanni, 2001; Mintzberg, 1994).

Reconceptualist

The Reconceptualist approach challenges traditional views of curriculum. It sees the curriculum as a dynamic, socially constructed process. This approach encourages critical reflection and social activism. However, it may lack practical applicability (Pinar, 2012; Giroux, 1988; Eisner, 1994).

Integrating Curricular Approaches in Educational Leadership

Integrating these approaches allows leaders to create a balanced educational environment. Each approach offers unique insights and methods. Leaders can tailor strategies to specific contexts and student populations, fostering a balanced and effective learning environment.

Behaviorist: Focuses on structured curricula.

System: Promotes coherence within the institution.

Academic: Emphasizes disciplinary knowledge.

Humanistic: Supports personal development.

Directive: Ensures consistency and accountability.

Reconceptualist: Encourages critical reflection and activism.

Conclusion

Integrating these approaches into leadership practices provides a comprehensive framework. It fosters intellectual, ethical, and personal development. These methods create enriching and transformative learning experiences. By applying these strategies, leaders can better prepare students for the complexities of modern life. This integration not only enhances academic outcomes but also promotes holistic growth, ensuring that students are well-equipped to navigate and succeed in an ever-evolving world. Through these approaches, educational leaders can inspire and cultivate lifelong learners.

References

Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future. Educational Technology Publications.

Eisner, E. W. (1994). The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. Macmillan.

Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Teachers College Press.

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Bergin & Garvey.

Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. M. (2016). Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and Implementation. SAGE Publications.

Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A's, Praise, and Other Bribes. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Kohn, A. (2000). The Schools Our Children Deserve: Moving Beyond Traditional Classrooms and "Tougher Standards." Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row.

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners. Free Press.

Noddings, N. (2005). The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. Teachers College Press.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Pearson.

Pinar, W. F. (2012). What Is Curriculum Theory? Routledge.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Charles Merrill.

Senge, P. M. (2000). Schools That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education. Doubleday.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). Leadership: What is in It for Schools? RoutledgeFalmer.

Skinner, B. F. (1954). Science and Human Behavior. Free Press.